This attempts to present an evaluation of the National Quality Assurance Framework (NQAF) designed for adult education in Greece, with particular reference to the case of the second chance schools (SCS), using the experiences and perceptions of adult education practitioners and administrators. The NQAF, designed by the General Secretariat for Adult Education (GSAE), aimed at monitoring every adult education activity and all the adult education programmes run by the GSAE. One of these programmes is the SCS, which the paper focuses on. This is a flexible and innovative programme which provides individuals of 18 and over who have not completed the nine year compulsory education with the possibility of obtaining a lower secondary education certificate and of integrating into social, economic and professional life. The paper draws upon the written responses of SCS heads, teachers, adult educators, and administrators to the NQAF. Findings indicate a top-down approach adopted in the design of the NQAF; a lack of flexibility and properly trained evaluators and consultants; and a lack of consideration paid to the SCS’ special characteristics and to the traits of those to whom the SCS programme addresses.
|Keywords:||Evaluation, Adult Education, National Quality Assurance Framework Second Chance Schools, Greece|
Lecturer in Continuing and Adult Education, School of Human and Social Sciences, Open University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus